![]() |
November 21, 2008 |
![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Legal Briefs for HR! This update on issues that matter to employers is provided to HR professionals, in-house counsel, business owners and others who can benefit from receiving monthly updates on new laws, recent court cases, helpful websites and pending legislation. Anyone is welcome to join the group of over 3400 subscribers to this free newsletter. Just email me to be added to the group (or removed) and you can find previous editions posted on the Munck Carter, P.C. firm website at http://www.munckcarter.com/ under E-Newsletter. A warm welcome to new subscribers I had the pleasure of speaking to during presentations for the SHRM Texas State Council Legislative Impact Day, 49th Annual County Auditors' Institute, Texas A&M/Prairie View A&M Leadership Extension meeting and the Self Opportunity "Meeting of the Minds." Here's the latest: 1. What's Cookin' in Austin - Six bills that would have prevented employers from banning guns in their workplace parking lots have been shot down. The bills were sent to the House Calendars Committee but only one (SB 534) was set for a vote on the final day it was eligible for consideration by the full House. Due to the bill's placement on the calendar, the deadline for a vote passed before it got a second reading. Gov. Perry signed HB 991 into law, sealing the formerly public records that identify individuals who are licensed to carry a concealed weapon. The law took effect immediately, on May 23, so only law enforcement agencies will have access to that information. The proposed statewide smoking ban was snuffed out last week, too, so Texas employers must look to local ordinances to determine their obligations, if any, related to smoking in workplaces. For a list of Texas local ordinances on smoking, go to http://txshsord.coe.uh.edu/createReports.aspx. 2. What's Cookin' in DC -
3. Houston, We Have a Problem - Per a U.S. DOL press release, Mudlogging Company USA in Houston paid over $1.1 million in backpay to 233 employees, representing unpaid overtime between Aug. 2004 and Aug. 2006. The mistake? Paying a day rate to mudloggers, trainees and non-exempt unit managers without additional overtime for workweeks in which more than 40 hours were worked. 4. The Importance of Being Essential - A recent case points out the importance of identifying essential vs. marginal functions of jobs, in writing, before a dispute arises. Rehrs v. Iams Co. (8th Cir. 5-15-07) A warehouse technician worked in a facility that had rotating shifts. Following a heart attack and bypass surgery, he was temporarily accommodated with a fixed shift based on his doctor's recommendation. When the employee asked for the accommodation to be made permanent, the employer declined citing shift rotation as an essential function. The employee was advised of other fixed shift job openings, which he was either unqualified to perform or did not want to do. While on disability, he sued under the ADA. The court found for the employer and noted:
5. Bad Math - A doctor claimed he was lured to a new job based, in part, on a recruiting manager's representation that the doc would be eligible for full retirement benefits of $3100/month at age 62. He moved to a new state to accept the job and soon learned that the actual pension amount would be $816/month. The unhappy doc sued and lost in the district court (which said his state law fraud claim was preempted by ERISA), but the appeals court disagreed. At the time of the misreps, he was neither an employee nor a plan participant so he could not sue for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA. Further, his plea for reliance damages (i.e., what he lost by walking away from a higher salary and stock options with his former employer) were not related to the pension plan. Had he sued for expectation damages (i.e., the difference between the puffed and actual monthly retirement benefit), then ERISA would've come into play. Thurman v. Pfizer Inc. (6th Cir. 5-8-07). 6. More Fun With FMLA
7. Tech Toys - A wage claim is moving forward, in part, because of electronic time-keeping technology that allows employees to opt for "clock in as scheduled" as opposed to having the system register the actual time he or she is clocking in. The court observed that [1] tying the restaurant's computer system access to being clocked in infers that "off the clock work" will be performed; and [2] the FLSA's de minimis exception to compensability, which applies to brief periods of time that are difficult to calculate, is not available here since the electronic system allows for calculation of time to the minute. Fast v. Applebee's (W.D. Mo. 5-3-07) Watch out for the gap between what tech toys can do and what you should do! 8. A Taxing Decision - The Vermont Supreme Court found that home-based workers who knit and sew clothing on their own machines are "employees" who are eligible for unemployment comp benefits and their employer owed back taxes. The issue arose when a former worker filed for unemployment insurance benefits ("UI") after leaving a subsequent employer and had listed the clothing company among her prior employers. Fleece on Earth v. Dep't of Employment and Training (Vt. 5-4-07) States are increasingly questioning employee vs. contractor status, especially where state, UI and/or disability taxes are not being paid on certain workers. 9. Throwing Money Away - Last month, it was reported in Legal Briefs for HR that the Texas Attorney General had taken enforcement action against four businesses in as many weeks, due to their improper disposal of records containing personal identifiers, like name, address, social security numbers and debit/credit numbers. Add two more to the list . . . Austin-based EZCorp was sued on May 8 for disposing of customers' loan and pawn service applications in readily accessible trash bins and CNG Financial Corporation (and its subsidiaries, Check 'n Go of Texas, Inc. and Southwestern & Pacific Specialty Finance, Inc.), was sued on May 24 for the same offense, under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (penalties up to $20,000 per violation), the Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act (up to $50,000 per violation) and sec. 35.48 of the Business and Commerce Code (up to $500 for each record). A message is being sent to those who improperly dispose of customers' and employees' personal information . . . are you listening? 10. You're the Best - Congratulations to the many LB4HR subscribers who are listed in the Dallas Business Journal's "Best Places to Work in Dallas-Fort Worth" special edition (May 4 - 10)! The white Stetson for the best in each category went to: Frontline Source Group, Inc. (small business); esoftsolutions Inc./LiquidAgents Healthcare (mid-sized business); Medical Center at Plano (large business); and The Ritz-Carlton (business HQ'd outside of DFW). If you didn't read it, get your hands on a copy . . . the energy exuded by these organizations through their employees practically leaps off the page! 11. North Texas SHRM Annual Conference - Go to http://www.northtexasshrm.org/ to register for a 2-day conference to be held in Denton that has been approved for 14.5 HRCI certification credits and includes featured speaker, Libby Sartain of Yahoo Inc. 12. Immigration Seminar - The Texas Association of Business (TAB) has tapped into immigration reform as its monthly meeting topic for June. Brent Huddleston will discuss H-1B visas, Form I-9 work authorization and Social Security Administration "no match" letters during a lunch meeting on June 21 at the Crowne Plaza on Midway Road. To register, contact Monna Miller at mmiller@txbiz.org. 13. Employment Relations Symposium - TAB and SHRM have joined forces to offer another great two-day learning opportunity with a combo of attorney and HR professional speakers, including yours truly, to provide a legal and practical perspective on current workplace issues. Visit http://www.txbiz.org/ (See Quick Links) for a complete agenda, hotel and registration info. The Symposium will be held July 12 and 13 (with an optional meet-n-greet the evening of the 11th) at The Westin La Cantera Resort in San Antonio, TX! Audrey E. Mross Labor & Employment Attorney Legal Briefs for HR ("LB4HR") is provided to alert recipients to new developments in the law and with the understanding that it is guidance and not a legal or professional opinion on specific facts or matters. For answers to your specific questions, please consult with counsel. If you wish to be removed from the email group, reply and put "Remove" in the subject line. You may also reply to notify the author of an additional or changed email address. If you wish to post, reprint or send LB4HR for the benefit of your organization, please contact the author for permission. Upon approval, nonprofit entities may post, reprint or send LB4HR to their members for no fee. For-profit entities may be charged a nominal fee. LB4HR is copyrighted and may not be posted, reprinted or sent without permission, however individual subscribers are welcome to forward LB4HR to other individuals or within their place of employment without seeking permission, so long as the author's complete contact information is included. Subscribers are encouraged to notify their Internet Service Provider (ISP) that amross@munckcarter.com is a trusted source, in order to receive an uninterrupted subscription to LB4HR. Due to the size of the email group and occasional use of sensitive words, LB4HR can be perceived as spam or inappropriate email and deleted or diverted by your ISP's filter. |
![]()
Marshall Office |
|
Home |
Firm Overview |
Practice Areas |
Careers |
Attorney Profiles |
E-Newsletter News and Resources | Contact Us | Resource Links |
|